In April 2010, there was a over the Confucius Institute at Osaka Sangyo University in Osaka. During meetings discussing a proposed relocation of the institute between campuses, the director of the University Affairs Board denounced it as a ¡°cultural spy agency¡± for China and ¡°a ¡®soft landing¡¯ for China¡¯s expansionism.¡± Chinese overseas students at the university reacted angrily to his accusations; two months later he was asked to resign, and the university published a letter officially apologizing for his ¡°inappropriate and insensitive remarks.¡±

This incident was recently covered in a series of articles by the Sankei News, which critically examined the organizational impact of Confucius institutes based in , American and Australian universities. Such incidents highlight some difficult decisions for educational institutions in Japan and elsewhere engaging with Chinese soft- power initiatives.

For their supporters, Confucius Institutes are educational ¡± which aim to promote Chinese language and culture in foreign countries¡± and to encourage international understanding and exchange. However, for their critics, they are ¡ª alongside research funding tie-ups and investment from China ¡ª Trojan horses for Chinese Communist Party (CCP) influence in universities.