In recent years, the Akutagawa Prize has diversified its recipient pool: In 2022, the shortlist was all female writers, last year Saou Ichikawa was the first author with a severe physical disability to win and this week marked the first time artificial intelligence walked away with a piece of the prestigious literary award.
On Wednesday evening, Rie Qudan won the country’s most important prize for early career writers for “Tokyo-to Dojo-to,” or “Sympathy Tower Tokyo.” The novel is about an architect in the capital, billed as a narrative that “exposes the prophecy of the AI generation.”
In her acceptance speech, Qudan stated: “This is a novel written by making full use of a generative AI like ChatGPT, and probably about 5% of the whole text is written directly from the generative AI. I would like to work well with them to express my creativity.’”
The internet had some thoughts. Hundreds of comments poured in on social media platform X, while the last prize announcement received merely dozens. On the platform now known to be rife with AI bots, users called the award unfair and tantamount to plagiarism.
“If AI-generated works are subject to evaluation, then from now on, as AI evolves further, that would mean a work almost entirely created by AI would be OK too, no?” . “In that case, it would no longer be a competition between humans but a battle between AIs. Would that be alright when AI is prohibited in chess and go matches?”
生成础滨使った作品が审査対象になるのなら、来年以降、础滨の进化とともに作品のほぼ全部を础滨で书いた作品が出てきたとしても、それも翱碍なんだね。そうなるともはや人ではなく础滨同士の戦いだな。将棋?囲碁の対局は础滨禁止なのにどうなの。
— 食卓のゾーマ (@shokutakunozoma)
“With regard to an AI-generated work winning a literary award, people will be divided for and against,” . “However, this has the potential to generate new discussions on the fusion of literature and technology, and new developments are expected in the literary world as well. (About 5% of my reply was written by ChatGPT.)”
础滨による生成物で文学赏を受赏することについては、賛否が分かれるでしょう。しかし、これは文学と技术の融合において新しい议论を生む可能性があり、文学界においても新たな展开が期待されます。
（５％くらい颁丑补迟骋笔罢で书いたリプ）
— どMなキョン (@dom_kyon)
“It seems sales are everything,” .
“Do we need an AI Akutagawa Prize too,” , adding a robot emoji.
Several users have pointed out that the text of the story contains passages clearly delineated as “an answer given by AI.” If those passages comprise the 5% in question, users speculate, the incorporation of AI-generated text would be less problematic.
Publisher Shinchosha declined to comment. The author and prize committee did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
With your current subscription plan you can comment on stories. However, before writing your first comment, please create a display name in the Profile section of your subscriber account page.