Examining the canon of critical musings on Yukio Mishima, Marguerite Yourcenar¡¯s work might be favorably compared alongside Henry Scott-Stokes, John Nathan and Damian Flanagan¡¯s biographies.

Mishima: A Vision of the Void, by Marguerite Yourcenar.
160 pages

UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS, Biography.

Though they never met in person, the two authors knew and admired the other¡¯s work. Yourcenar¡¯s voice, therefore, is that of one literary figure chiming with another. Yourcenar visited Mishima¡¯s widow, Yoko, who made it clear she wished her husband to be remembered as a literary icon, rather than ultranationalist, active homosexual, and occasional dabbler in bodybuilding, acting, singing and filmmaking.

There exists a tendency, scrupulously avoided by Yourcenar, to dwell on the more vulgar aspects of Mishima¡¯s personality. In his essay, ¡°Mishima Yukio: The Suicidal Dandy,¡± Ian Buruma wrote that he was, ¡°like those Japanese society ladies who dress in evening gowns in Tokyo but in kimonos abroad.¡± Mishima¡¯s predilection for Hawaiian shirts, white, patent leather shoes, and the faux-Spanish villa he built are an easy target. Rather than lingering on the question of whether Mishima was a predominantly Western or Japanese writer, Yourcenar concludes that his work was of a country hurriedly Westernized, but retaining immutable native elements.

The Japanese public have never quite come to terms with the feast of death, the visceral horror of his stage-managed suicide. Yourcenar is less squeamish, hinting at an admiration for the author¡¯s contrived end. ¡°Mishima envisioned a certain kind of death,¡± she wrote, ¡°and made of it his masterpiece.¡±